Really wet BP ball-milling-- any problems?
Retrieved: 12/28/2014
Last Post: 01/21/2002
clark kromer 1/3/02 A few months ago I bought a ball mill from the website www.hobbyfireworks.com and I made excellent BP with it (using the traditional mix of 75% KNO3 - 15% C(willow) -10% S). I ran it without any water added to the powder and lead media for 5 hours. When I ignited it in a test, it almost burned as fast as perc/Al flash powder (no flash of light as in Al) and it left no residue. In retrospect, I think dry milling BP is dangerous. Has anyone ball-milled using boiling water -- not to merely dampened it -- but to make it a thick liquid (like oil)? It seems to me that this takes away most of the risk of accidental ignition, provided there are no leaks. Of course drying it out would be slow (but I am not in a rush) -- perhaps in shallow cookie tins in the sun. Would the component chemicals be less intimately combined sitting for hours in solution while drying in the sun? When it dries to about 4% moisture I would then press it in my hydraulic press (from Harbour Freight) under 12 tons pressure and corn/screen. What % proportion powder vs water should I use (for example, 30% water and 70% powder by weight in the mill ????). Would the finished product be just as good as one that had been dry milled? Thanks, Clark. :-) Don Thompson 1/3/02 If you put water in the ballmill, (other than perhaps a light misting to help with the dust, unnecessary, I don't do that but I have heard that some do), and then attempt to air dry the powder you have defeated the purpose of the mill. The KNO3 will grow into large crystals while the water is evaporating and separate out from the mix. -- Don Thompson Another Thompson Scion "clark kromer"wrote in message news:fee751d.0201032025.11aac2a0@posting.google.com... - show quoted text - Bill Nelson 1/4/02 clark kromer wrote: > > In retrospect, I think dry milling BP is dangerous. Has anyone It can be risky - which is why you put the mill in a remote place where it will not cause any damage if it explodes. > ball-milled using boiling water -- not to merely dampened it -- but to > make it a thick liquid (like oil)? It seems to me that this takes > away most of the risk of accidental ignition, provided there are no > leaks. Of course drying it out would be slow (but I am not in a rush) > -- perhaps in shallow cookie tins in the sun. Would the component > chemicals be less intimately combined sitting for hours in solution > while drying in the sun? When it dries to about 4% moisture I would Yes, it will be less intimate. Much of the nitrate will be free crystals. It would be better than the "CIA" powder, but not nearly as good as the dry milled product. -- Bill Nelson (bi...@peak.org) Doc Ferguson 1/4/02 A light misting of alcohol and water holds down the dust, there is a bit of caking at first, but if you feel better about a slightly moist mixture it does work. Personally dry milling with a remote cord is still the best. If your drum is tight, no leakage sparks the danger goes down. Doc Ferguson - show quoted text - Lloyd E. Sponenburgh 1/4/02 clark kromer wrote: > A few months ago I bought a ball mill from the website > www.hobbyfireworks.com harumph! > In retrospect, I think dry milling BP is dangerous. Has anyone > ball-milled using boiling water -- not to merely dampened it -- but to > make it a thick liquid (like oil)? Not effective. During drying, you'll 'undo' the milling as the KNO3 crystalizes. You should note that at moisture content from 0% to about 3%, black powder becomes MORE sensitive and powerful as the moisture content increases. Mill remotely, dry, and avoid static-causing situations. This is NOT a good time of year to be milling any explosives. LLoyd clark kromer 1/4/02 Dear NG, Thanks for all who answered my post. I quess dry milling is the best way to go. Unfortunately, I live in the city and a mill explosion would alarm neighbors (and police!). Too many people around me. I have been thinking about getting a portable AC generator (about $350 from Coleman, I think?), 300 ft extension chord and going way, way, way back into the woods to mill. Really isolated. Bringing a fire estinquisher might not be a bad idea if a mishap takes place. Speaking of milling BP, I know the type of charcoal makes all the difference. Even when ball milling for 10 HOURS!!! using grocery store grilling charcoal "bricks", the resulting powder burns painfully slow and leaves a lot of residue. Steve B. (I think that is his name), who has recently posted to this group, sells excellent airfloat willow charcoal and the service is fast. Bill Nelson 1/4/02 Lloyd E. Sponenburgh wrote: > harumph! Well, Lloyd. You can't expect everyone to know that you sell the best mill kit around. After all, you do not do much self promotion. -- Bill Nelson (bi...@peak.org) Richard Ogden 1/4/02 "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" wrote in message news:3C35A61B.93C72E6@mindspring.com... > Mill remotely, dry, and avoid static-causing situations. This is NOT a > good time of year to be milling any explosives. Lloyd, they're not all in the Northern Hemisphere. But I certainly wouldn't mill BP or mix flash in Florida right now...I got a nice jolt just grabbing the car door handle this morning. I momentarily forgot my trick of holding tight to a key and touching the key to the metal first. -Rich Lloyd E. Sponenburgh 1/7/02 The "harumph" was not aimed toward the quality of the the kit, which I assume to be the best. Rather, it was to the unattibuted, copyrighted design -- which _is_ the best. LLoyd - show quoted text - Jeff 1/7/02 Bill Nelson wrote > Well, Lloyd. You can't expect everyone to know that you sell the best > mill kit around. After all, you do not do much self promotion. "Not much" is a bit of an understatement. I have been on this group for two years and had no idea. Sorry, Lloyd. I'll never mention the "H" word again if someone asks about a mill. Can you tell me about your kit? Jeff Lloyd E. Sponenburgh 1/8/02 I have a 'real job', now. I dissolved Bridge City Enterprises about two years ago, and offered to certain avid amateurs to license my designs. One frequent poster to this group has negotiated with me to begin marketing kits of my design. When he's ready to announce (soon, I believe), you'll see it here. He is a capable craftsman, and should do as good a job as I did making a quality kit. LLoyd - show quoted text - deefault 1/10/02 "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" wrote: > Not effective. During drying, you'll 'undo' the milling as the KNO3 > crystalizes. [SNIP!] Nice thought. I've been wondering for a long time why BP incorporation mills throoughout history haven't changed a lot: The heavy wheel mills in modern facilities (Goex, DuPont, and pictures in Davis' text, etc...) haven't really changed from their water-wheel-driven predecessors where the moistened powder is basically crushed by a multi-ton wheel. Eh? (why fool with a good thing?) This is combined with reports of ball-millers reporting exceptionally-fast batches of BP made in high-temperature (summer time or in a "Sponen-Mill" with a closed lid allowing temperatures to rise) conditions. IIRC, several authors under these conditions have emptied their mills to find their product agglomerated into a single hardened mass accumulated into one side of the mill jar. I would think that this is from the small amount of (atmospheric-derived from humidity?) water in the mixture going into the mill. But, the quantity of water would be small. Shimizu, then, in his chapter in the third edition of Lancaster, (paraphrased) says that the wet-method of mixing the three components of BP, subsequently ground in a ball mill, makes the fastest product. All of this makes me wonder: Prior to graining BP, is the best method of BP preparation to merely finely sub-divide the composition (i.e., dry-milling)? Or, is moisture a way to get (dissolved) nitrate more intimately associated with the other componets (particularly charcoal, and maybe sulfur too)? Von Maltitz describes the Goex Pennsylvania plant's process similar to Davis' account: wet/moist milling of the components in a multi-ton wheel mill. Both authors note that particular attention is paid to the quantity of moisture used. Although I haven't done the math (It's been a long time since thermochemistry), I suspect that multiple tons of pressure produced by a wheel mill could adibatically (frictionally?) heat the moistened mixture immediately beneath the wheel. This could dissolve the nitrate, at least transiently. Then, with rapid (adiabatic) cooling as the wheel rolls-off the mixture, nitrate crystals would rapidly come-out of solution, presumably in a very fine or inimately associated state with the other components. This cycle would then repeat each time the powder was rolled-over by the milling wheel, along with the mixing and crushing of the components. Are the observed agglomerated fast-lots of ball-milled powder formed by at least partial dissolution of the nitrate? Could one reliably reproduce this effect? Is this a testable hypothesis? I for one would doubt that the Goex people (as nice as they are) would let me place a termistor with a lot of green powder beneath one of their ball mill wheels. For safety sake, I don't know that I'd like to hang around to find out, eh? Could one construct a ball mill with a big enough diameter, say with a jar based on a 5 gallon bucket or a trash-can, where the weight of the milling media (I guess using a non-sparking ceramic) would cause adiabatic solution of nitrate? Am I really worrying about something so over-the-edge that I should simply go to bed and dream about something more productive? I, for one, would have to wait for the spring thaw before I could run a ball mill in warm conditions. Anyone here able to test this in a warmer climate? PiRho Tech 1/21/02 If your remote site is in a forest, likely nothing will help a fire(by the time you get there anyway). If it's a grassy area, a rake will work far better, and less expensively, than any designed fire extinguisher- as anyone w/ display fireworks can attest. Mark D.